• ActiveLoop
    • Solutions
      Industries
      • agriculture
        Agriculture
      • audio proccesing
        Audio Processing
      • autonomous_vehicles
        Autonomous & Robotics
      • biomedical_healthcare
        Biomedical & Healthcare
      • generative_ai_and_rag
        Generative AI & RAG
      • multimedia
        Multimedia
      • safety_security
        Safety & Security
      Case Studies
      Enterprises
      BayerBiomedical

      Chat with X-Rays. Bye-bye, SQL

      MatterportMultimedia

      Cut data prep time by up to 80%

      Flagship PioneeringBiomedical

      +18% more accurate RAG

      MedTechMedTech

      Fast AI search on 40M+ docs

      Generative AI
      Hercules AIMultimedia

      100x faster queries

      SweepGenAI

      Serverless DB for code assistant

      Ask RogerGenAI

      RAG for multi-modal AI assistant

      Startups
      IntelinairAgriculture

      -50% lower GPU costs & 3x faster

      EarthshotAgriculture

      5x faster with 4x less resources

      UbenwaAudio

      2x faster data preparation

      Tiny MileRobotics

      +19.5% in model accuracy

      Company
      Company
      about
      About
      Learn about our company, its members, and our vision
      Contact Us
      Contact Us
      Get all of your questions answered by our team
      Careers
      Careers
      Build cool things that matter. From anywhere
      Docs
      Resources
      Resources
      blog
      Blog
      Opinion pieces & technology articles
      langchain
      LangChain
      LangChain how-tos with Deep Lake Vector DB
      tutorials
      Tutorials
      Learn how to use Activeloop stack
      glossary
      Glossary
      Top 1000 ML terms explained
      news
      News
      Track company's major milestones
      release notes
      Release Notes
      See what's new?
      Academic Paper
      Deep Lake Academic Paper
      Read the academic paper published in CIDR 2023
      White p\Paper
      Deep Lake White Paper
      See how your company can benefit from Deep Lake
      Free GenAI CoursesSee all
      LangChain & Vector DBs in Production
      LangChain & Vector DBs in Production
      Take AI apps to production
      Train & Fine Tune LLMs
      Train & Fine Tune LLMs
      LLMs from scratch with every method
      Build RAG apps with LlamaIndex & LangChain
      Build RAG apps with LlamaIndex & LangChain
      Advanced retrieval strategies on multi-modal data
      Pricing
  • Book a Demo
    • Back
    • Share:

    Decentralized Control

    Decentralized control enables efficient management of complex systems by distributing control tasks among multiple controllers with limited information sharing.

    Decentralized control systems have gained significant attention in recent years due to their ability to manage complex systems efficiently. These systems involve multiple controllers that work together to optimize a system's performance while having access to different information. By distributing control tasks among various controllers, decentralized control systems can achieve better robustness and scalability compared to centralized control systems.

    One of the main challenges in decentralized control is designing algorithms that can effectively balance performance and robustness. Researchers have proposed various methods to address this issue, such as using genetic algorithms to optimize the design of centralized and decentralized controllers, or employing separation principles to systematically design decentralized algorithms for consensus optimization.

    Recent research in decentralized control has focused on various applications, including the control of complex decentralized systems, stochastic control, consensus optimization, and thermal control of buildings. For instance, researchers have developed methods for designing optimal decentralized controllers for spatially invariant systems, as well as techniques for controlling large collaborative swarms using random finite set theory.

    Practical applications of decentralized control can be found in various domains, such as energy management, robotics, and transportation. For example, decentralized control has been applied to manage distributed energy resources, where controllers are designed to minimize the expected cost of balancing demand while ensuring voltage constraints are satisfied. In robotics, decentralized control has been used to manage large swarms of robotic agents, enabling efficient control decisions based on localized information. In transportation, decentralized control can be employed to manage traffic flow in urban areas, reducing congestion and improving overall traffic efficiency.

    One company that has successfully implemented decentralized control is Skydio, a drone manufacturer. Skydio's autonomous drones use decentralized control algorithms to navigate complex environments, avoid obstacles, and perform tasks such as inspection and surveillance. By leveraging decentralized control, Skydio's drones can operate efficiently and robustly, even in challenging conditions.

    In conclusion, decentralized control offers a promising approach to managing complex systems by distributing control tasks among multiple controllers with limited information sharing. This approach enables improved robustness and scalability compared to centralized control systems, making it suitable for a wide range of applications. As research in decentralized control continues to advance, we can expect to see even more innovative solutions and applications in various domains.

    What is an example of a decentralized control?

    Decentralized control can be found in various domains, such as energy management, robotics, and transportation. One example is the management of distributed energy resources, where multiple controllers are designed to minimize the expected cost of balancing demand while ensuring voltage constraints are satisfied. Another example is the control of large swarms of robotic agents, where each agent makes control decisions based on localized information, enabling efficient and robust operation.

    What is centralized and decentralized control?

    Centralized control refers to a system where a single controller is responsible for managing and optimizing the entire system's performance. In contrast, decentralized control involves distributing control tasks among multiple controllers, each with access to different information. Decentralized control systems can achieve better robustness and scalability compared to centralized control systems, as they can handle complex systems more efficiently by leveraging localized information and decision-making.

    What is an example of decentralization?

    An example of decentralization can be found in the management of traffic flow in urban areas. Decentralized control can be employed to manage traffic signals at individual intersections, allowing each intersection to make control decisions based on local traffic conditions. This approach can reduce congestion and improve overall traffic efficiency, as opposed to a centralized system where a single controller manages all traffic signals.

    What is a decentralized control system used for?

    A decentralized control system is used for managing complex systems efficiently by distributing control tasks among multiple controllers with limited information sharing. This approach enables improved robustness and scalability compared to centralized control systems. Decentralized control systems can be applied in various domains, such as energy management, robotics, and transportation, to optimize system performance and handle complex tasks.

    How does decentralized control improve robustness and scalability?

    Decentralized control improves robustness by allowing multiple controllers to operate independently, reducing the impact of a single point of failure. If one controller fails or encounters an issue, the other controllers can continue to operate and maintain system performance. Scalability is improved because decentralized control systems can handle an increasing number of components or agents without overloading a single controller, making it easier to manage large-scale systems.

    What are the challenges in designing decentralized control algorithms?

    One of the main challenges in designing decentralized control algorithms is balancing performance and robustness. Effective algorithms must optimize system performance while maintaining robustness against uncertainties, disturbances, and component failures. Researchers have proposed various methods to address this issue, such as using genetic algorithms to optimize controller design or employing separation principles to systematically design decentralized algorithms for consensus optimization.

    How does Skydio use decentralized control in its autonomous drones?

    Skydio, a drone manufacturer, uses decentralized control algorithms in its autonomous drones to navigate complex environments, avoid obstacles, and perform tasks such as inspection and surveillance. By leveraging decentralized control, Skydio's drones can operate efficiently and robustly, even in challenging conditions. Each drone makes control decisions based on localized information, allowing it to adapt to its environment and complete tasks without relying on a central controller.

    What are some recent research directions in decentralized control?

    Recent research in decentralized control has focused on various applications, including the control of complex decentralized systems, stochastic control, consensus optimization, and thermal control of buildings. For instance, researchers have developed methods for designing optimal decentralized controllers for spatially invariant systems and techniques for controlling large collaborative swarms using random finite set theory. As research in decentralized control continues to advance, we can expect to see even more innovative solutions and applications in various domains.

    Decentralized Control Further Reading

    1.Optimization Design of Decentralized Control for Complex Decentralized Systems http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00596v1 Ying Huang, Jiyang Dai, Chen Peng
    2.Decentralized stochastic control http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.4545v1 Aditya Mahajan, Mehnaz Mannan
    3.Systematic Design of Decentralized Algorithms for Consensus Optimization http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.01023v1 Shuo Han
    4.Sufficient statistics for linear control strategies in decentralized systems with partial history sharing http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.2739v1 Aditya Mahajan, Ashutosh Nayyar
    5.Optimal $H_2$ Decentralized Control of Cone Causal Spatially Invariant Systems http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04544v1 M. Ehsan Raoufat, Seddik M. Djouadi
    6.Dynamic Teams and Decentralized Control Problems with Substitutable Actions http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.03592v1 Seyed Mohammad Asghari, Ashutosh Nayyar
    7.Decentralized Thermal Control of Buildings http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.13654v1 Vikas Chandan
    8.Decentralized Control of Large Collaborative Swarms using Random Finite Set Theory http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.07221v1 Bryce Doerr, Richard Linares
    9.Decentralized Stochastic Control of Distributed Energy Resources http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.00093v3 Weixuan Lin, Eilyan Bitar
    10.Hierarchical Decentralized Robust Optimal Design for Homogeneous Linear Multi-Agent Systems http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.01848v1 Dinh Hoa Nguyen, Tatsuo Narikiyo, Michihiro Kawanishi, Shinji Hara

    Explore More Machine Learning Terms & Concepts

    Decentral

    Decentralization is a key concept in the development of blockchain technology and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), enabling peer-to-peer transactions and reducing reliance on centralized authorities. However, achieving true decentralization is challenging due to scalability limitations and the need to balance decentralization with other factors such as security and efficiency. Decentralized finance (DeFi) applications, such as decentralized banks, aim to facilitate transactions without the need for intermediaries. However, recent studies have found that many decentralized banks have not achieved a significant degree of decentralization. A comparative study among mainstream decentralized banks, such as Liquity, Aave, MakerDao, and Compound, revealed that MakerDao and Compound are more decentralized in their transactions than Aave and Liquity. The study also found that primary external transaction core addresses, such as Huobi, Coinbase, and Binance, still play a significant role in these banks" operations. Decentralization also faces challenges in the context of blockchain technology. A quantitative measure of blockchain decentralization has been proposed to understand the trade-offs between decentralization and scalability. The study found that true decentralization is difficult to achieve due to skewed mining power distribution and inherent throughput upper bounds. To address these challenges, researchers have outlined three research directions to explore the trade-offs between decentralization and scalability. In the case of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), a definition of 'sufficient decentralization' has been proposed, along with a general framework for assessing decentralization. The framework includes five dimensions: Token-weighted voting, Infrastructure, Governance, Escalation, and Reputation. This framework can help guide the future regulation and supervision of DAOs. Practical applications of decentralization can be found in various domains. For example, decentralized control systems can be designed to maintain centralized control performance while reducing the complexity of the system. Decentralization can also have a positive impact on early human capital accumulation, as seen in the case of power devolution to municipalities in Cameroon. In conclusion, decentralization is a promising concept with the potential to revolutionize various industries, particularly in the context of blockchain technology and decentralized finance. However, achieving true decentralization remains a challenge, and further research is needed to explore the trade-offs between decentralization, scalability, and other factors.

    Decentralized POMDP (Dec-POMDP)

    Decentralized Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (Dec-POMDPs) provide a framework for multi-agent decision-making in uncertain environments. This article explores the challenges, recent research, and practical applications of Dec-POMDPs. Dec-POMDPs are a powerful modeling tool for multi-agent systems, where agents must collaborate to achieve a common goal while dealing with partial observability and uncertainty. However, solving Dec-POMDPs is computationally complex, often requiring sophisticated algorithms and techniques. Recent research in Dec-POMDPs has focused on various approaches to tackle this complexity. Some studies have explored mathematical programming, such as Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP), to derive optimal solutions. Others have investigated the use of policy graph improvement, memory-bounded dynamic programming, and reinforcement learning to develop more efficient algorithms. These advancements have led to improved scalability and performance in solving Dec-POMDPs. Practical applications of Dec-POMDPs include multi-agent active perception, where a team of agents cooperatively gathers observations to compute a joint estimate of a hidden variable. Another application is multi-robot planning in continuous spaces with partial observability, where Dec-POMDPs can be extended to decentralized partially observable semi-Markov decision processes (Dec-POSMDPs) for more natural and scalable representations. Dec-POMDPs can also be applied to decentralized control systems, such as multi-access broadcast channels, where agents must learn optimal strategies through decentralized reinforcement learning. A company case study in the application of Dec-POMDPs is the multi-robot package delivery problem under uncertainty. By using belief space macro-actions and asynchronous decision-making, the proposed method can provide high-quality solutions for large-scale problems, demonstrating the potential of Dec-POMDPs in real-world scenarios. In conclusion, Dec-POMDPs offer a robust framework for multi-agent decision-making in uncertain environments. Despite the computational challenges, recent research has made significant progress in developing efficient algorithms and techniques for solving Dec-POMDPs. As a result, Dec-POMDPs have found practical applications in various domains, showcasing their potential for broader adoption in the future.

    • Weekly AI Newsletter, Read by 40,000+ AI Insiders
cubescubescubescubescubescubes
  • Subscribe to our newsletter for more articles like this
  • deep lake database

    Deep Lake. Database for AI.

    • Solutions
      AgricultureAudio ProcessingAutonomous Vehicles & RoboticsBiomedical & HealthcareMultimediaSafety & Security
    • Company
      AboutContact UsCareersPrivacy PolicyDo Not SellTerms & Conditions
    • Resources
      BlogDocumentationDeep Lake WhitepaperDeep Lake Academic Paper
  • Tensie

    Featured by

    featuredfeaturedfeaturedfeatured