• ActiveLoop
    • Solutions

      INDUSTRIES

      • agricultureAgriculture
        agriculture_technology_agritech
      • audioAudio Processing
        audio_processing
      • roboticsAutonomous & Robotics
        autonomous_vehicles
      • biomedicalBiomedical & Healthcare
        Biomedical_Healthcare
      • multimediaMultimedia
        multimedia
      • safetySafety & Security
        safety_security

      CASE STUDIES

      • IntelinAir
      • Learn how IntelinAir generates & processes datasets from petabytes of aerial imagery at 0.5x the cost

      • Earthshot Labs
      • Learn how Earthshot increased forest inventory management speed 5x with a mobile app

      • Ubenwa
      • Learn how Ubenwa doubled ML efficiency & improved scalability for sound-based diagnostics

      ​

      • Sweep
      • Learn how Sweep powered their code generation assistant with serverless and scalable data infrastructure

      • AskRoger
      • Learn how AskRoger leveraged Retrieval Augmented Generation for their multimodal AI personal assistant

      • TinyMile
      • Enhance last mile delivery robots with 10x quicker iteration cycles & 30% lower ML model training cost

      Company
      • About
      • Learn about our company, its members, and our vision

      • Contact Us
      • Get all of your questions answered by our team

      • Careers
      • Build cool things that matter. From anywhere

      Docs
      Resources
      • blogBlog
      • Opinion pieces & technology articles

      • tutorialTutorials
      • Learn how to use Activeloop stack

      • notesRelease Notes
      • See what's new?

      • newsNews
      • Track company's major milestones

      • langchainLangChain
      • LangChain how-tos with Deep Lake Vector DB

      • glossaryGlossary
      • Top 1000 ML terms explained

      • deepDeep Lake Academic Paper
      • Read the academic paper published in CIDR 2023

      • deepDeep Lake White Paper
      • See how your company can benefit from Deep Lake

      Pricing
  • Log in
image
    • Back
    • Share:

    Locally Linear Embedding (LLE)

    Locally Linear Embedding (LLE) is a powerful technique for nonlinear dimensionality reduction and manifold learning, enabling the simplification of complex data structures while preserving their essential features.

    LLE works by first reconstructing each data point from its nearest neighbors in the high-dimensional space, and then preserving these neighborhood relations in a lower-dimensional embedding. This process allows LLE to capture the local structure of the manifold, making it particularly useful for tasks such as data visualization, classification, and clustering.

    Recent research has explored various aspects of LLE, including its variants, robustness, and connections to other dimensionality reduction methods. For example, one study proposed a modification to LLE that reduces its sensitivity to noise by computing weight vectors using a low-dimensional neighborhood representation. Another study introduced generative versions of LLE, which assume that each data point is caused by its linear reconstruction weights as latent factors, allowing for stochastic embeddings that relate to the original LLE embedding.

    Furthermore, researchers have investigated the theoretical connections between LLE, factor analysis, and probabilistic Principal Component Analysis (PCA), revealing a bridge between spectral and probabilistic approaches to dimensionality reduction. Additionally, quantum versions of LLE have been proposed, offering potential speedups in processing large datasets.

    Practical applications of LLE can be found in various domains, such as astronomy, where it has been used to classify Sloan Galaxy Spectra, and in the analysis of massive protostellar spectra. In both cases, LLE outperformed other dimensionality reduction techniques like PCA and Isomap, providing more accurate and robust embeddings.

    One company leveraging LLE is Red MSX Source, which uses the technique to analyze and classify near-infrared spectra of massive protostars. By applying LLE to their data, the company can obtain more faithful and robust embeddings, leading to better classification and analysis of large spectral datasets.

    In conclusion, Locally Linear Embedding is a versatile and powerful method for nonlinear dimensionality reduction and manifold learning. Its ability to capture local structure and adapt to various data types makes it an invaluable tool for researchers and practitioners alike, connecting to broader theories and applications in machine learning and data analysis.

    Locally Linear Embedding (LLE) Further Reading

    1.Locally Linear Embedding and its Variants: Tutorial and Survey http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.10925v1 Benyamin Ghojogh, Ali Ghodsi, Fakhri Karray, Mark Crowley
    2.LLE with low-dimensional neighborhood representation http://arxiv.org/abs/0808.0780v1 Yair Goldberg, Ya'acov Ritov
    3.Generative Locally Linear Embedding http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.01525v1 Benyamin Ghojogh, Ali Ghodsi, Fakhri Karray, Mark Crowley
    4.An Iterative Locally Linear Embedding Algorithm http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6463v1 Deguang Kong, Chris H. Q. Ding, Heng Huang, Feiping Nie
    5.When Locally Linear Embedding Hits Boundary http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.04423v2 Hau-tieng Wu, Nan Wu
    6.Reducing the Dimensionality of Data: Locally Linear Embedding of Sloan Galaxy Spectra http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.2238v1 J. T. VanderPlas, A. J. Connolly
    7.Theoretical Connection between Locally Linear Embedding, Factor Analysis, and Probabilistic PCA http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.13911v2 Benyamin Ghojogh, Ali Ghodsi, Fakhri Karray, Mark Crowley
    8.Quantum locally linear embedding for nonlinear dimensionality reduction http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.07854v3 Xi He, Li Sun, Chufan Lyu, Xiaoting Wang
    9.Local Neighbor Propagation Embedding http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.16009v1 Shenglan Liu, Yang Yu
    10.Locally linear embedding: dimension reduction of massive protostellar spectra http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06915v1 J. L. Ward, S. L. Lumsden

    Locally Linear Embedding (LLE) Frequently Asked Questions

    What is Locally Linear Embedding (LLE)?

    Locally Linear Embedding (LLE) is a nonlinear dimensionality reduction and manifold learning technique that simplifies complex data structures while preserving their essential features. It is particularly useful for tasks such as data visualization, classification, and clustering. LLE works by reconstructing each data point from its nearest neighbors in the high-dimensional space and preserving these neighborhood relations in a lower-dimensional embedding, capturing the local structure of the manifold.

    How does LLE work?

    LLE works in two main steps. First, it reconstructs each data point from its nearest neighbors in the high-dimensional space by finding the optimal weights that minimize the reconstruction error. Second, it preserves these neighborhood relations in a lower-dimensional embedding by finding the optimal coordinates that minimize the difference between the original and reconstructed weights. This process allows LLE to capture the local structure of the manifold and create a simplified representation of the data.

    What is the difference between LLE and t-SNE?

    LLE and t-SNE are both nonlinear dimensionality reduction techniques, but they have different approaches to preserving the structure of the data. LLE focuses on preserving local neighborhood relationships by reconstructing each data point from its nearest neighbors, while t-SNE (t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding) aims to preserve pairwise similarities between data points by minimizing the divergence between probability distributions in the high-dimensional and low-dimensional spaces. In general, LLE is more suitable for capturing local structure, while t-SNE is better at preserving global structure and producing visually appealing embeddings.

    What is the algorithm of LLE?

    The LLE algorithm consists of the following steps: 1. For each data point, find its k nearest neighbors in the high-dimensional space. 2. Compute the optimal weights that minimize the reconstruction error for each data point using its nearest neighbors. 3. Preserve the neighborhood relations in a lower-dimensional embedding by finding the optimal coordinates that minimize the difference between the original and reconstructed weights.

    What are some applications of LLE?

    LLE has been applied in various domains, such as astronomy for classifying galaxy spectra, and in the analysis of massive protostellar spectra. In both cases, LLE outperformed other dimensionality reduction techniques like PCA and Isomap, providing more accurate and robust embeddings. Companies like Red MSX Source also use LLE to analyze and classify near-infrared spectra of massive protostars, leading to better classification and analysis of large spectral datasets.

    What are the limitations of LLE?

    LLE has some limitations, including sensitivity to noise, difficulty in handling large datasets, and the need to choose an appropriate number of nearest neighbors (k). Additionally, LLE may not perform well when the manifold has complex global structure or when the data points are not uniformly distributed on the manifold.

    How does LLE compare to other dimensionality reduction techniques?

    LLE is a nonlinear dimensionality reduction technique that focuses on preserving local neighborhood relationships. It is particularly useful for capturing local structure in the data. Other techniques, such as PCA (Principal Component Analysis) and Isomap, have different approaches to dimensionality reduction. PCA is a linear technique that preserves global structure by finding the directions of maximum variance, while Isomap is a nonlinear technique that preserves geodesic distances between data points. LLE tends to outperform these methods in cases where local structure is more important or when the data lies on a nonlinear manifold.

    What are some recent advancements in LLE research?

    Recent research in LLE has explored various aspects, including its variants, robustness, and connections to other dimensionality reduction methods. Some studies have proposed modifications to LLE that reduce its sensitivity to noise or introduced generative versions of LLE that allow for stochastic embeddings. Researchers have also investigated the theoretical connections between LLE, factor analysis, and probabilistic PCA, revealing a bridge between spectral and probabilistic approaches to dimensionality reduction. Quantum versions of LLE have been proposed as well, offering potential speedups in processing large datasets.

    Explore More Machine Learning Terms & Concepts

cubescubescubescubescubescubes
  • Subscribe to our newsletter for more articles like this
  • deep lake database

    Deep Lake. Database for AI.

    • Solutions
      AgricultureAudio ProcessingAutonomous Vehicles & RoboticsBiomedical & HealthcareMultimediaSafety & Security
    • Company
      AboutContact UsCareersPrivacy PolicyDo Not SellTerms & Conditions
    • Resources
      BlogDocumentationDeep Lake WhitepaperDeep Lake Academic PaperHumans in the Loop Podcast
  • Tensie

    Featured by

    featuredfeaturedfeaturedfeatured